Lampiran 4/ Annex 4
YEAR 2000 – SHIP EQUIPMENT COMPLIANCE TABLE
Equipment of Ship |
Equipment or System consequence |
Operator action if maltifunction noted |
Ship consequence if maltifunction not noted |
Remarks |
Gyro Compass |
The gyro may wander, provide incorrect heading information or shut down |
|
Affects Auto Pilot, ARPA, Radar, Visual bearings, set and drift information on GPS. Could result in grounding. |
Latitude and speed corrections may be by way of embedded chip |
Auto Pilot |
The equipment may not steer correctly or may shut down |
|
Affects maintaining the required course which could result in grounding or collision |
Embedded chips may be used in adaptive auto pilots to control veering due to weather |
GPS |
The GPS may revert to DR mode, provide incorrect position information and motion or shut down |
|
If position is not checked using other navigational methods or aids this could result in grounding. |
GPS receivers affected by GPS Rollover |
Radar |
The radar may provide incorrect target information and motion or shut down |
|
Affects collision avoidance and navigation. Could result in collision or grounding. |
Embedded chips may be used for timing purposes. All JRC radars Y2K compliant. |
ARPA |
The equipment may provide incorrect target data or shut down |
|
Affects target information which could result in collision, especially in restricted visibility. |
Embedded chips may be used for timing purposes |
Echo Sounder |
The equipment may provide incorrect depth information or shut down |
|
Affects depth information which could result in grounding if operating in draft critical |
Embedded chips may be used for timing purposes |
Log |
The equipment may provide incorrect speed information or shut down |
|
Affects target information on ARPA, set and drift calculation by GPS, DR positions. Could result in grounding |
Embedded chips may be used for timing |
ECDIS |
The ECDIS may provide incorrect chart display, or incorrect position or shut down |
|
Affects chart information, position, course and speed made good. Could result in grounding |
May not be affected as ECDIS is a recent development and may be Y2K compliant |
Weather Facsimile receiver |
May not tune correctly or shut down |
|
Lack of information can affect decisions on weather avoidance |
Embedded chips may be used for frequency control. |
MF/HF and VHF transceivers and DSC systems |
May not operate |
|
May be unable to send ship-ship distress alerts |
Following manufacturers advise their equipment is Y2K compliant: Skanti Furuno JRC |
Inmarsat C |
May not operate |
|
May be unable to send and receive ship-shore alerts and MSI. |
Following manufacturers advise their equipment is Y2K compliant: Furuno JRC Thrane and Thrane (majority of equp’t on Aust ships) advise all transceivers compliant, however early software versions for message terminals (1.5, 1.51, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0 and 3.01) will not store EGC messages, but will still send and receive distress alerts. Software fix for this problem expected soon. |
NBDP (radio telex) |
May not operate |
May be unable to receive ongoing distress traffic and MSI. In A4 Sea Areas |
Following manufacturers advise their equipment is Y2K compliant: Furuno JRC Thrane and Thrane Skanti | |
NAVTEX Receivers |
May not print out messages |
|
May not receive some local MSI in certain areas |
Following manufacturers advise their equipment is Y2K compliant: Furuno JRC |
406 EPIRBS |
May not operate (although unlikely) |
May be unable to send distress alert |
Following manufacturers advise their equipment is Y2K compliant: Furuno JRC Skanti | |
Clocks |
The clocks, may stop, operate erratically or show incorrect time |
Affects time keeping and records keeping, astro navigation calculations |
Embedded chips may be used in ships clocks systems |
|
Engine Movement logger |
The equipment may record incorrect times or shut down |
Affects records of engine movements. Some systems may be interlocked with bridge control of engine. |
Embedded chips may be used for date and time measurement | |
Loading Computer (PC Type) |
Incorrect stress calculations or total shut down |
Overstressing the ship’s hull |
Machine date in the built-in operating system (BIOS) | |
Loading Computer (dedicated) |
Incorrect stress calculations or total shut down |
Overstressing the ship’s hull |
Embedded chips may be in the stability program |
|
Cargo handling equipment (cranes) |
Loading or discharge rates Compromised or shut down of equipment |
Damage to ship’s structure and/or personnel |
Embedded chips may be used for timing purposes |
|
Containers (reefer) |
Shut down of control mechanism or wrong timing for temperature |
Over demand on power supply, resulting in possible blackout of V/L |
Embedded chips may be used for timing purposes |
|
Cargo handling equipment (self -discharge) |
Loading or discharge rates Compromised or shut down of equipment |
Damage to ship’s structure and/or personnel |
Embedded chips may be used for timing purposes and for weight measurement systems | |
Hull stress monitoring equipment |
Shut down of system or incorrect stress measurement and readout |
Hull overstressed either alongside a wharf or in a seaway |
Embedded chips may be used for timing purposes |
|
Berthing aids (doppler) |
Shut down of system or wrong rates of approach and/or distance off read outs |
Damage to ship and berth |
Embedded chips may be used for timing and speed measurement purposes | |
Tanktainers |
Shut down or incorrect venting or cooling arrangements |
Gas expansion leading to tank rupture or damage |
Embedded chips may be used for timing purposes | |
Pump monitoring and control including pump alarms |
The start, stop and speed controls may not function, Automatic emergency trips including high temperature, low lube oil pressure, over-speed etc, may not function. Alarms may not function. |
Overpressure of cargo hoses/lines may occur and a cargo spill may occur. Pump may overheat and cause a fire or explosion. |
Pressure gauges, bearing temperature, amp gauges and rpm indicators are unlikely to be affected however some ships might have this information electronically processed and displayed. It is likely that in these cases non-electronic gauges would be provided. Alarms may not be indicated on the cargo control system display. | |
Valve Control |
Valve may be unable to be operated or uncontrolled valve actuation may occur. Indicators may not show correct positions. |
Overpressure of cargo hoses/lines may occur and the possibility of a cargo spill exists |
Level of computer/IC control will vary extensively from ship to ship. Some ships might have no electronic components controlling valves, some ships might have fully computerised cargo valve control system. | |
Loading Computer (tankers) |
May cease to function |
Stress limits may be exceeded. Possible loss of stability in double hull tankers. |
Many cargo computers are PC based. Some are connected on-line to the cargo monitoring system. | |
Tank level and high level alarms |
Tank level indication may fail or give an incorrect reading. High level alarms may not function |
During loading, an erroneously low reading may cause a cargo spill. High level alarms may not function, which will increase the chances of a cargo spill |
There are a variety of tank level measuring systems in use which calculate and display remote readings. Nearly all use electronic data processing in some way. The possibility of displaying erroneous tank level exists. High level alarms generally are designed to operate as simply and reliably as possible however some high level alarm systems use electronic components and are integrated into the cargo control system. | |
Tank Temperature |
Tank Temperature indication may fail or give an incorrect reading |
This item is not critical in the short term |
Tank temperature variations usually do not affect ship safety over short periods of time | |
Tank Pressure |
Tank Pressure indication may fail or give an incorrect reading |
Ship may not be fitted with a secondary backup for tank venting. Overpressure may be undetected and result in structural damage, explosion, fire and cargo spillage. |
Although the consequences of this failure are extreme, it is not likely to occur unless the primary venting system fails, or is operated incorrectly. |
|
Line Pressure |
Line pressure indication may fail or give an incorrect reading |
Overpressure of cargo lines, cargo hoses may occur |
Electronic processing of line pressure readings is not common. |
|
Pump monitoring and control |
The start, stop and speed controls may not function. Automatic emergency trips may not function. |
Instability or overstressing might result if cargo operations continue. Double hull tankers may adopt an "angle of loll" |
Cargo pumps and ballast pumps will probably have similar control systems. | |
Ballast valve control |
Valves may be unable to be operated or uncontrolled valve actuation may occur. |
Instability or overstressing might result if cargo operations continue. Double hull tankers may adopt an "angle of loll". Stress limits may be exceeded. |
Cargo valves and ballast valves will probably have similar control systems. | |
Tank level gauging |
Tank level indication may fail or give an incorrect reading |
Incorrect ballasting may occur resulting in slack tanks and loss of stability on double hulled tankers. |
Failure of ballast tank level would probably be associated with failure of cargo tank level gauging. | |
Oil discharge monitor |
PPM monitor may fail to function. L/nautical mile and total oil discharged may fail to function. Automatic operation may fail. |
MARPOL requirements for oil content of ballast water discharge may not be met. |
Failure of the oil discharge monitor is not a threat to the safety of the ships. | |
Ventilation fans |
Build up of explosive /toxic gases due to fan stoppage. |
Explosion, personnel overcome by gas |
Failure of fixed gas monitors will result in dangerous consequences if a cargo leak occurs. | |
Fire main system |
Remote/auto start may fail |
Unable to effectively fight fires |
||
Foam system |
Foam system controls are usually operated locally. Failure due to Y2K is unlikely |
|||
Inet Gas System |
If the IG system fails completely, cargo operations can be continued as per MO 15 appendix 5 |
IG system is generally only operational during discharging | ||
Pressure monitor/ controller, gauges, indicators and controls |
Electronically processed pressure displays, IG indicators, gauges and controls may cease to function |
Over-pressure or under-pressure of cargo tank, P/V valves and P/V breaker should prevent structural damage however O2 may be admitted to the tank if there is prolonged under-pressure |
The level of electronic processing in IG monitoring and control systems will vary from ship to ship. | |
Boiler uptake valve |
Not usually electronically controlled |
|||
IGS |
IGS unit may not start, it may cease operation |
` |
||
Scrubber controls and monitoring |
Scrubber pump may stop |
Bad quality IG may be produced. IG system may shut down. |
||
IG fans – fan monitoring and fan controls including automatic shut down systems |
Fans may fail to start or may fail to stop |
Over-pressure or under-pressure of cargo tank, P/V valves and P/V breaker should prevent structural damage however O2 may be admitted to the tank if there is prolonged under-pressure. Fans may be overheat and cause a fire. |
Fans are connected to various automatic IG shut-downs. The automatic shut-down system may have Y2K non compliant embedded chips. | |
Oxygen Analyser |
No reading or incorrect reading |
Unknown O2 in cargo tanks. |
The oxygen analyser is connected to the automatic shutdown system for the IG system. O2 analyser signal might be electronically processed. |
|
Pressure regulating control valve |
Valve may fail to function in automatic or manual mode |
Over-pressure or under-pressure of cargo tank, P/V valves and P/V breaker should prevent structural damage however O2 may be admitted to the tank if there is prolonged under-pressure. |
||
Deck Seal |
Water level control and monitoring may fail |
Back flow of cargo gases to engine room |
Deck seals vary in design and may or may not have electronic control of water level. | |
IG tank inlet valves |
Normally manually operated |
|||
P/V breaker |
No Electronic components |
|||
Vent system |
No Electronic components |
|||
Winches |
Electronic controls of winches is highly unlikely to be fitted |
|||
Main engine control and automation system |
The system may wander increased or reduced revs, or in extreme case main engine shut down |
Dangerous situation could arise in confined waters |
||
Main engine performance monitor |
May result in incorrect monitoring, in turn may feed incorrect data to control & automation system |
Dangerous situation could arise in confined waters |
||
Aux engine control and automation system |
The system may wander which may affect electrical power generation |
Unavailability of non-essential system, or in extreme circumstances complete blackout |
||
Aux engine performance monitor |
May result in incorrect monitoring, in turn may feed incorrect data to control & automation system |
Could affect electrical power supply |
||
Electronic combustion control and burner management (boiler control system) |
The system may malfunction |
Increase / reduced steam preassure affecting operation of steam driven machinery and services. In extreme cases safety valves may lift or the burners may shut down |
||
Soot blower system (boilers & exhaust gas economisers) |
The system may malfunction |
Inefficient soot blowing which may result in high exhaust temperatures. |
||
Power management system |
The system may mulfunction |
Desired limits may be exceeded. In extreme cases machinery may operate at dangerous levels or may completely shut down |
||
Torque meter |
Malfunction |
|||
Main engine remote control (bridge control) |
The system may malfunction |
Dangerous situation could arise in confined waters. |
||
Oil mist detector |
The system may malfunction |
Dangerous situation could arise. In an extreme case there could be a crank-case explosion. |
||
Main engine governor system |
The system may malfunction |
Designed limits may be exceeded which may result in serious break down. |
||
Steering gear system |
The system may malfunction |
Dangerous situation could arise in confined waters |
||
Fire detection & alarm system |
The system may malfunction |
Fire may not be detected in its early stages. |
||
UMS ALARM SYSTEM |
The system may malfunction |
Machinery malfunction may not be detected in the early stages. |
||
Purifiers |
The control system may malfunction |
May result in main engine fuel oil not properly purified with is resultant problems |
||
I G system (generators) |
The control system may malfunction |
Improper functioning on the system. I G gas composition incorrect. High gas temperatures. |
||
Incinerator |
The burner control system may malfunction |
Improper functioning of the incinerator |
||
Air conditioning plant |
The control system may malfunction |
Improper functioning of the plant – designerd space temperatures not being maintained |
||
A C compressor electronic control safety |
As above |
As about |
||
Oil separation environment |
The system may malfunction |
Overboard discharges may not be in accordance with regulatory limits |
||
Bilge OWS |
As above |
As above |
||
Oil content monitor (Bilge) |
As above |
As above |
||
Vibration manitoring equipment |
The system may malfunction |
Machinery may malfunction |
||
Gas compressors |
The system may malfunction |
|||
Cathodic protection system |
The system may malfunction |
Corrosion may be accelerated |
||
Elevator |
The system may malfunction |
Nuisance |
The Countdown Calender - Key dates at a glance
1 st January 1999 9 th September 1999 |
Many system use 9’s as an end-of-file marker ( i.e. it is the last record in a file or list ) and new records with ‘99’ or ‘9999’ could be subsequently seen as end-of-file and cause the system to malfunction. |
22 nd August 1999 |
This is relevant to GPS as the original design had a register counting weeks since the base date of 6 th January 1980. This register will be full and will be rollver to zero on 22 nd August 1999. |
1 st January 2000 |
If a system handles the year portion of the date as two digits , actions and calculations may be incorrect. |
29 th February 2000 |
This is a leap day and may not appear in some system calendars. |
1 st March 2000 |
This is the day after the leap day and the system may carry forward erroneous data and calculations because of the addition of an unexpected leap day. |
31 st December 2000 |
This is the 366 th day of the leap year and this has been known to cause problems previously. |
1 st January 2001 |
This is the day after the 366 th day and the system may be carrying forward erroneous data as a result. |